Dramatic breakthrough for improving some plants via GM

Online now: No visible users
Post Reply
"Scientists Have 'Hacked Photosynthesis' In Search Of More Productive Crops".

This is complicated so bear with me.

There are three methods of photosynthesis: CAM (which we will ignore for now), C3, and C4. C3 is used by around 90% of all plants while C4 is used by around 5% (the numbers I've seen were very squishy).

C4 plants like corn and sugarcane have considerable advantages over C3 plants. Both use a huge protein with a longer name so it has been nicknamed Rubisco. In C4 plants Rubisco is protected so that it can take CO2 from air and eventually produce plant sugars. C3 plants lack that protection so instead of the sites on Rubisco getting CO2 it sometimes will get oxygen molecules which Rubisco will make into toxic chemicals. There is considerable plant energy wasted removing such chemicals.

Reseachers working for the USDA have been working with C3-based tobacco plants because they are easier to work with. Through gene manipulation they were able to shut down tobacco's process to remove the toxic chemicals, then replace it with a more efficient method for removing them. The result were plants that "grew faster, and they grew up to 40 percent bigger" than regular tobacco plants.

To be sure: they are still uncertain if that additional growth will also produce more fruit and seeds as well as more leaves and bigger stalks. Even with that latter limitation it should still be useful in many plants.

They are attempting to replicate this for other C3 plants that are staple crops around the world like black-eyes peas.
ukimalefu Rebel? resistance? why not both?
User avatar
obvs precoupado
Send private message
Black-eyed peas are a staple crop around the world?

Dear God. Those things are awful.
ukimalefu Rebel? resistance? why not both?
User avatar
obvs posted:
Black-eyed peas are a staple crop around the world?

Dear God. Those things are awful.


I don't think those specifically, but peas in general? yes. Peas are good source of protein from plants. I like most kinds of peas I've tried.
obvs precoupado
Send private message
Oh, I like peas. I used to bring them to work and eat a can of them for lunch.

But blackeyed peas must taste like Satan's dingleberries.
Looking up some history and other details on Wikipedia:

Black-eyed peas probably originated in West Africa though were probably spread by humans throughout the temperate and equatorial parts of the Old World. Its range was extended to the New World through some slave ships getting cheap African seeds to feed slaves, being first introduced to the US in Virginia in the 17th century (thus likewise to other slave plantations around the New World).

Black-eyed peas are very drought-resistant which gives them an advantage over other staples like wheat and rice. The crop has relatively few pests and disease. It is also a nitrogen-fixer so can help to re-enrich soil, enabling farmers to alternate with other food crops through crop rotation.
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
obvs precoupado
Send private message
Right. Sure. But they used to make us eat those every New Year's Day as part of a superstition.

I don't know if you've ever eaten them, but they're awful.
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
they do have a certain texture, but I would imagine that most of the new year's peas were cooked by people who didn't have much idea on how to do it well and didn't care that much
We are also talking about regions like sub-Saharan Africa which simply do not have any other choices for food crops.
Old Yoda agitator
User avatar
[I read the Topic Title to mean that GM(General Motors) had a breakthrough to improve (auto) plants]
Old Yoda posted:
[I read the Topic Title to mean that GM(General Motors) had a breakthrough to improve (auto) plants]

dv
User avatar
Old Yoda posted:
[I read the Topic Title to mean that GM(General Motors) had a breakthrough to improve (auto) plants]

obvs precoupado
Send private message
Old Yoda posted:
[I read the Topic Title to mean that GM(General Motors) had a breakthrough to improve (auto) plants]

TOS
User avatar
i thought you were talking about black-eyed susans

i was all like, "how can flowers be a global crop?"
obvs precoupado
Send private message
You've never had black-eyed peas before?

Count yourself lucky.
You must have gotten some poorly prepared ones, because I had some as a side with BBQ in Charleston, and they were quite tasty.
obvs precoupado
Send private message
I ate black-eyed peas every New Year's Day for the first ~25 years of my life, and a few other times, and they were godawful every time.

Maybe black-eyed peas just aren't for me.
Perhaps so. Hard to say considering how personal taste is.

obvs, you are in the DC area, yes? Surely you could ask around for some recommendations for soul food restaurants. Maybe not go whole hog and get everything with black-eyed peas, but maybe ask for a dish recommendation from the waiter/cook?

On the other hand, you are in the US with its wide abundance of just cuisines. No sin if you choose just to avoid anything using black-eyed peas.
Anyway: no comments how this technique is employing considerable genetic modifications?

I am assuming since CRISPR was never mentioned that that particular method was not used.
I remain a bit skeptical they can genetically modify normal crop plants this extensively and have it work properly in the end. Still, if it works, it'll be wonderful.
I must admit some skepticism myself since I was unaware that anyone could do the level of genetic engineering claimed, but I am by no means an expert watching every paper that comes across.

And, of course, even if they were successful with tobacco plants, this doesn't mean they can apply the same methods to other C3 plants to likewise improve other plants.

Still hoping....
Subsequent topic  /  Preceding topic
Post Reply

Dramatic breakthrough for improving some plants via GM