The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Page: 1 ... 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184 ... 912
Online now: Google [Bot], ukimalefu
Post Reply
TOS
User avatar
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
DukeofNuke posted:
I see no indication that she is not consenting


actually the thing to look for is any sign that she is consenting

see any of that? 'cause i don't


Kinda tough to determine either way from one millisecond in time.


do you see it in that "millisecond" or not?


Apparently you see a creeper but it's just as easily a married couple who have been shopping, she's tired and he started rubbing her leg, she closes her eyes and relaxes.
You simply can't tell from that picture one way or the other.


in that picture, do you see consent?

i'm not sure why it's such a difficult question to answer
TOS posted:
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
DukeofNuke posted:
I see no indication that she is not consenting


actually the thing to look for is any sign that she is consenting

see any of that? 'cause i don't


Kinda tough to determine either way from one millisecond in time.


do you see it in that "millisecond" or not?


Apparently you see a creeper but it's just as easily a married couple who have been shopping, she's tired and he started rubbing her leg, she closes her eyes and relaxes.
You simply can't tell from that picture one way or the other.


in that picture, do you see consent?

i'm not sure why it's such a difficult question to answer


Define consent.
I see a man touching a woman on her leg. She has her eyes closed.
I don't know if she just closed them and he'd been touching her awhile.
I don't know if after he touched her she opened her eyes and smiled.
I don't see how you can see or not see consent from 1 millisecond in time.
Not enough information.
TOS
User avatar
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
Farmerkev posted:
TOS posted:
DukeofNuke posted:
I see no indication that she is not consenting


actually the thing to look for is any sign that she is consenting

see any of that? 'cause i don't


Kinda tough to determine either way from one millisecond in time.


do you see it in that "millisecond" or not?


Apparently you see a creeper but it's just as easily a married couple who have been shopping, she's tired and he started rubbing her leg, she closes her eyes and relaxes.
You simply can't tell from that picture one way or the other.


in that picture, do you see consent?

i'm not sure why it's such a difficult question to answer


Define consent.
I see a man touching a woman on her leg. She has her eyes closed.
I don't know if she just closed them and he'd been touching her awhile.
I don't know if after he touched her she opened her eyes and smiled.
I don't see how you can see or not see consent from 1 millisecond in time.
Not enough information.


i find it odd that you're dodging this so vehemently ... makes me a bit concerned, to tell you the truth

the answer is simple: in that image there is no sign of consent

it doesn't mean she didn't give it or allow it, doesn't mean any of the scenarios you suggested are true or not

it just means there's no sign of consent
fiddlesticks it
TOS
User avatar
Farmerkev posted:
fiddlesticks it


i'm not consenting
maurvir Steamed meat popsicle
User avatar
maurvir Steamed meat popsicle
User avatar
TOS
User avatar
radarman posted:
Image


that's .... i dunno, man, that's ... not cool

Image
sturner Ancient Soldier
User avatar
radarman posted:
Image

Hasn't this been posted before?

Anyway, I like that it's from a Cro-magnon skinning chant.
Geesie Couldn't hit it sideways
User avatar
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
juice Inadvertently correct
User avatar
That reminds me. I have a Classic II in my closet. I should see if it still boots.
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
Is that Bowie with a Mario hat?

Image
Pithecanthropus Roast Master
User avatar
ukimalefu posted:
Is that Bowie with a Mario hat?

Image

No, it's Mario in a Bowie hat. Unless time runs backwards, that is.
TOS
User avatar
TOS
User avatar
maurvir Steamed meat popsicle
User avatar
jkahless Custom Title
User avatar
maurvir Steamed meat popsicle
User avatar
Geesie Couldn't hit it sideways
User avatar
C. Ives Lacks Critical stick fiddling Thinking
User avatar
Fricking snobby rich waiters.
TOS
User avatar
who knew londoners were such cheap scumbags
Geesie Couldn't hit it sideways
User avatar
Probably has a lot more to do with minimum wage in other countries.
TOS
User avatar
Yori Program
User avatar
TOS posted:
who knew londoners were such cheap scumbags


The UK doesn't have a culture of tipping like your side of the pond. We actually pay our staff a living wage over here. :p
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
TOS
User avatar
TOS
User avatar
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
I guess it could be real. One hint if you can't see it, think: calculator.

Image
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
ukimalefu posted:
I guess it could be real. One hint if you can't see it, think: calculator.

Image


Please tell me what you think you see...
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
it's right there!
dv
User avatar
Warin posted:
ukimalefu posted:
I guess it could be real. One hint if you can't see it, think: calculator.

Image


Please tell me what you think you see...


Look at the serial number.
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
Ahhhh. ok.

Thought it was something in the design... and since the Vimy Memorial is a beautiful piece of art, I was afraid I'd have to get stern with someone.
TOS
User avatar
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
ukimalefu want, but shouldn't, may anyway
User avatar
Subsequent topic  /  Preceding topic
Post Reply

The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Page: 1 ... 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184 ... 912