mmaverick wrote:whoever made that didn't really watch the show.
But they knew all about D&D.
degeneric wrote:.
I don't recognize these men. Who are they?
Looks like John Travolta on the right ? Who's the other guy, (or, who do you think he looks like?)
Nicholas Cage
The Doctor returns March 30
ukimalefu wrote:The Doctor returns March 30
Not that there's anything wrong with the current guy, but I'd really love to see the Doctor played by an actor who is over 45 again.
Ian McKellan?
Ian McShane?
Patrick Stewart?
Chris Barrie?
Hugo Weaving?
Paul Hogan?
Ian McShane?
Patrick Stewart?
Chris Barrie?
Hugo Weaving?
Paul Hogan?
rjprice wrote:Ian McKellan?
Ian McShane?
Patrick Stewart?
Chris Barrie?
Hugo Weaving?
Paul Hogan?
Oh, god, any of those would get me to start watching Dr. Who.
Jason Statham or Ray Winstone would be interesting choices too.
i vote for helena bonham-carter
Yes, a female Doctor is past due and she would be excellent.
I'll throw in some more:
Peter Capaldi, aka "Malcolm Tucker"
Nigel Bennett
Thomas Craig
I'll throw in some more:
Peter Capaldi, aka "Malcolm Tucker"
Nigel Bennett
Thomas Craig
She could stick fiddling do it, too.TOS wrote:i vote for helena bonham-carter
What's a tortoise?
know what a turtle is?
A lot like one of those?
ack!
the next line was "of course"
followed by "same thing"
at least i think so
the next line was "of course"
followed by "same thing"
at least i think so
Eh, it's been a while. Lucky I remembered the tort bit.
What do they mean by 'gay curious'? Curious about gay people?
matt wrote:
kinda looks like canada is the world headquarters for gay
Fricken eskimos.
I was about to say "But stick fiddling look at New Mexico."
matt wrote:I was about to say "But stick fiddling look at New Mexico."
maybe it's just the canadians who spend the winter there ... blowing the curve (so to speak)
Matt, I totally want to be your sex partner.
chikie wrote:What do they mean by 'gay curious'? Curious about gay people?
From the original article which posted the map, the surveyors meant "[h]ere are straight people who either have had or would like to have a same-sex experience".
BUT...it is a completely valueless map. There is no mention in that article if the map represents a percentage of overall participants per geographic district or if these are the number of positive respondents or ANYTHING. For all we might know the reddest parts of that map represent zones where there were just 10 (or more) positive responses and the blue ones, 1 or 0 positive responses.
Now immediately above this map they detail a survey result showing that of straight people about 23% have had a same-sex encounter and that another 11% who haven't would like to. Given this I would sincerely doubt the extreme lowball case that I gave in the last sentence in the paragraph immediately above, but there are simply no details for this map which is very odd considering how otherwise numbers-rich the article is.
I think the biggest thing you can take from that map is the USA is super repressed.
chikie wrote:What do they mean by 'gay curious'? Curious about gay people?
Remember kids, when "anchors aweigh", it's no longer gay!
