sturner wrote:rjprice wrote:![]()
And the second post was for emphasis?
I did edit the link when it didn't work in preview but I have no idea why it posted twice. I figured it was best not to mess with it when it was working.
sturner wrote:rjprice wrote:![]()
And the second post was for emphasis?
radarman wrote: I'm still amazed no one has commented on the story about a Japanese company selling the "scent of a young boy's backside", along with other questionable scents.
TOS wrote:Geesie wrote:![]()
that's truly astonishing
you know that plenty of chumps will buy that because they think it's the bestest
dv wrote:TOS wrote:Geesie wrote:![]()
that's truly astonishing
you know that plenty of chumps will buy that because they think it's the bestest
If it isn't a directional optical cable, you know it's crap.
http://www.amazon.com/Audioquest-Sydney ... B006ZMEZFS
Pithecanthropus wrote:dv wrote:TOS wrote:Geesie wrote:![]()
that's truly astonishing
you know that plenty of chumps will buy that because they think it's the bestest
If it isn't a directional optical cable, you know it's crap.
http://www.amazon.com/Audioquest-Sydney ... B006ZMEZFS
I tried the non-directional cables. They shot video all over the wall behind my TV. What a mess!
agedgruel wrote: Now that is art.
DukeofNuke wrote:![]()
TOS wrote:Geesie wrote:![]()
that's truly astonishing
you know that plenty of chumps will buy that because they think it's the bestest