The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

juice · Post by **juice** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:46 am

Red shirts. They didn’t have a chance.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:21 am

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 2:31 pm

Post by dv » Sun Feb 03, 2019 3:19 pm

thetravelsite.com forwards to: http://www.thetravelsite.com.au

Neat.

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 4:10 pm

I checked that, too.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 6:53 pm

you people are very details-oriented

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 6:54 pm

this one's for kev, wherever he is

Post by dv » Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:28 pm

Silly 14th Amendment Citizen. The 2nd amendment only applies to people who were citizens before the 14th was unconstitutionally passed. The federal government hasn't been legitimate sine 1861.

Something something.

juice · Post by **juice** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:25 pm

That’s one way to interpret it...

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:10 pm

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:55 am

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:05 am

Apple should think different

But those are from 2013, so Apple didn't.

http://nickolaylamm.com/art-for-clients ... t-plastic/

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:12 am

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:27 am

DukeofNuke · Post by **DukeofNuke** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:36 am

I would like to know in which episode the winner appeared, and for them to be pointed out.

Post by dv » Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:24 pm

DukeofNuke wrote: I would like to know in which episode the winner appeared, and for them to be pointed out.

http://trekcore.com/blog/2013/09/star-t ... breakfast/

Well, we’ve been able to confirm with sources in the know that despite all of those Trek fans who desperately entered hoping to fulfill their dreams, the actual winner was an elderly woman who chose to receive monetary compensation rather than to actually fly out to Los Angeles – it’s certainly a disappointing end to such a rare opportunity.

DukeofNuke · Post by **DukeofNuke** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:40 pm

Fascinating ...

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:57 pm

look at those miserable bastards

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:38 pm

juice · Post by **juice** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:41 pm

Celebration of the winner. I like it.

juice · Post by **juice** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:42 pm

Also, sweet tea is gross.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:47 pm

user · Post by **user** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:19 pm

juice · Post by **juice** » Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:20 pm

Chernobyl?

user · Post by **user** » Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:30 am

yup, art project

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:43 pm

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:23 pm

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:54 am

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:30 am

maurvir wrote:

interesting guy, he's on a mission to stop astronomers from automatically discounting alien life as an explanation for mysterious phenomena

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:45 am

from today's hamilton spectator (hamilton is southwest of toronto)

Séamas · Post by **Séamas** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 12:32 pm

TOS wrote:
maurvir wrote:

interesting guy, he's on a mission to stop astronomers from automatically discounting alien life as an explanation for mysterious phenomena

Does he have the same mission about astronomers automatically discounting the "God did it" explanation?

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 12:53 pm

Séamas wrote:
TOS wrote:
maurvir wrote:

interesting guy, he's on a mission to stop astronomers from automatically discounting alien life as an explanation for mysterious phenomena

Does he have the same mission about astronomers automatically discounting the "God did it" explanation?

i was unaware that was a widespread attitude among astronomers

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:41 pm

I never watched that. Didn't even know it existed.

Post by dv » Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:52 pm

ukimalefu wrote:

I never watched that. Didn't even know it existed.

I was a fan.

DukeofNuke · Post by **DukeofNuke** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:58 pm

Rick and Morty. Same difference.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:19 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:27 pm

Post by dv » Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:27 pm

Okay, that's scary.

Post by dv » Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:51 pm

Metacell · Post by **Metacell** » Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:59 pm

dv wrote:

Okay, that's scary.

Big deal, let's see him do two stops in a row.

The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)