The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

justine · Post by **justine** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 12:29 am

I can't take credit for finding this (TOS) but i can take credit for sharing it! :lol:

hookercat.jpg

StaticAge · Post by **StaticAge** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:57 am

jkahless wrote:

Neat idea, but no way that photo looks that way, all the images are pristine without any distortion from the water.

DEyncourt · Post by **DEyncourt** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:11 am

StaticAge wrote:
jkahless wrote: [snip of pic]

Neat idea, but no way that photo looks that way, all the images are pristine without any distortion from the water.

Agreed. Look at the crispness of the "reflection" of sail planes of the sub and compare it to the wavering image of the poles overlapping the sub.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:13 am

very well, shall we classify it as an epic fail, gentlemen?

user · Post by **user** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:40 am

Just an interesting photoshop job.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:15 am

The real reflection would still be neat

Pithecanthropus · Post by **Pithecanthropus** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:40 am

Kirk wrote: The real reflection would still be neat

On a supremely calm day, under the right light, and from the perfect angle, it would look pretty cool.

user · Post by **user** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:42 am

The rest of the time the building would look really odd. All sorts of people would tilt their heads trying to understand it.

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:14 pm

Level of difficulty? Asbestos

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:33 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:37 pm

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:41 pm

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:45 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:10 pm

Pariah · Post by **Pariah** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:46 pm

user wrote: Just an interesting photoshop job.

Not even interesting. I am far from a Photoshop expert but even I could have made that chop look more realistic.

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:51 pm

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:06 pm

this is what happens when you don't arm your cops ...

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:36 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 2:02 pm

First Soviet beauty pageant in 1988

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 2:03 pm

dig the borat swimsuit

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:36 pm

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:59 pm

Okay then....I hope your sneeze kills you.

was the reddit caption.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:18 am

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:19 am

obvs wrote:
Okay then....I hope your sneeze kills you.
was the reddit caption.

Now that's a meme I have seen in a long time...

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 9:39 am

user · Post by **user** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 9:48 am

Nematode maze?

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:10 pm

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:35 pm

While I'm not thrilled about cramming more people on an airplane, at least this seating would minimize issues sharing armrests and bumping shoulders and knees.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:42 pm

No armrest to share!

All legs would touch.

The people sitting by the windows better wear diapers because they're not going anywhere until the plane arrives at destination.

These would cause in-flight riots, plus some terrorism.

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:43 pm

Kirk wrote: While I'm not thrilled about cramming more people on an airplane, at least this seating would minimize issues sharing armrests and bumping shoulders and knees.

That is a safety disaster waiting to happen.

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:48 pm

"Four more inches of legroom" my ass.

They'd just scrunch the seats four inches closer together.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:48 pm

Armrests could be added. They would fold up like the seats.
The seats fold up. That would indeed make emergency disembarking more dangerous.
Nobody's legs would touch in that picture. Ditto for shoulders.
Hips might touch but that's it.
The window seat passenger already has to ask the other two to move to go to the bathroom, unless of course they are all tiny people. I don't see how this seating make that materially worse.
What would be worse is motion sickness. Some people couldn't sit there. There's no way I could sit in that middle seat and not throw up.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:54 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:55 pm

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:58 pm

Kirk wrote:Nobody's legs would touch in that picture. Ditto for shoulders.
Hips might touch but that's it.

Didn't want to use a pic of fat people, but that happens too. Train, bus, airplane, it's happened to me.

This human tetris seats are horrible.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:04 pm

Spreading like that is poor etiquette on the bus or train as well. Anybody attempting that, unless they look particularly frightening or weird, gets a nudge by me when taking the metro. That guy might get punched.

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:17 pm

I don't think there's a problem sitting like that unless there are so few seats left that people are standing.

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:36 pm

DukeofNuke · Post by **DukeofNuke** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:00 pm

Uh ... ?

The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: Re:

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)