ukimalefu
want, but shouldn't, may anyway
Nini wrote:Yknow, we should have a Senate image thread in The Senate. Shnicky has been shed of his responsibility of creating one because he's a slacker and a rabblerouser so anyone, please?
no
Why not?
blurt wrote:And this: it belongs in the Senate.
Maybe you can start a "political Image association thread™" over there. Until then.....these are SFW:
nope.jpeg
So, there's lofi lolcats now?
ukimalefu
want, but shouldn't, may anyway
Nini wrote:So, there's lofi lolcats now?
Seems to be about humiliating pets. And I bet those are done by facebook instagram users who can't even find a meme maker website to add text to their images. If they can't do it on facebook, they don't know how to do it.
I reckon you bet wrong.
ukimalefu
want, but shouldn't, may anyway
ukimalefu wrote:Nini wrote:I reckon you bet wrong.
wanna bet?
No.
rjprice wrote:You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?
Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.
Pretty much.Nini wrote:Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.
Nini wrote:ukimalefu wrote:Nini wrote:I reckon you bet wrong.
wanna bet?
No.rjprice wrote:You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?
Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.
I'm that way with most photo-realism--or any "realism" that is derived from and slavishly copied from a photograph.
Realism/naturalism from a seated model (from life) on the other hand, I like very much.
The choice of medium is interesting. The ability to achieve that much color nuance from such limited media is very impressive.
No, actually stuff that is very seriously devoted to copying photographs (photorealism) in a conscious way is intriguing to me. I'm biased because of my own work, but just saying. Like there is a difference to me where you can tell someone just worked from a photograph and where someone knew that there was this real event but I am gong to meticulously work to copy a photo bit by bit and that the end result was pretty unreal as far as they were concerned. Its very elitist, I suppose, but if I know that the person has an awareness of how abstract "realism" is in art, then, there is a huge gap between that and someone who is just trying to imitate a photo because they think a photo is more real than an impressionistic expressionist painting or whatever. [/artgeek]Séamas wrote:Nini wrote:ukimalefu wrote:Nini wrote:I reckon you bet wrong.
wanna bet?
No.rjprice wrote:You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?
Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.
I'm that way with most photo-realism--or any "realism" that is derived from and slavishly copied from a photograph.
Realism/naturalism from a seated model (from life) on the other hand, I like very much.
The choice of medium is interesting. The ability to achieve that much color nuance from such limited media is very impressive.
I'm pro-freckles.
THE POWER OF GINGER COMPELS YOU
Can it not and say it did? Just Geesie turning on the charm is a big "RUN AWAY NOW" flag.
The choices are either run away or be drawn in.
I'm pretty sure being drawn in is a statutory rape charge alone.
Welcome to MacStack, where "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" is a pick-up line.
rjprice wrote:Welcome to MacStack, where "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" is a pick-up line.
He really is, he should totally put his back out more.
What I'd like to know is, did he find that pic on the web, or did he go out and take it himself just for laughs?
Always wonder.
ukimalefu
want, but shouldn't, may anyway
Nice, but not exactly practical.