The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:23 am

Nini wrote: Yknow, we should have a Senate image thread in The Senate. Shnicky has been shed of his responsibility of creating one because he's a slacker and a rabblerouser so anyone, please?

no

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:25 am

Why not?

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:23 am

Post by **rjprice** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:28 am

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:40 am

Freakout Jackson · Post by **Freakout Jackson** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:11 am

blurt wrote:And this: it belongs in the Senate.

Maybe you can start a "political Image association thread™" over there. Until then.....these are SFW:

nope.jpeg

Post by **rjprice** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:38 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:34 pm

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:47 pm

That dog doesn't look very shamed to me...

Post by **rjprice** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:14 pm

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:22 pm

So, there's lofi lolcats now?

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:07 pm

Nini wrote: So, there's lofi lolcats now?

Seems to be about humiliating pets. And I bet those are done by facebook instagram users who can't even find a meme maker website to add text to their images. If they can't do it on facebook, they don't know how to do it.

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:11 pm

I reckon you bet wrong.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:14 pm

Nini wrote: I reckon you bet wrong.

wanna bet?

Post by **rjprice** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:19 pm

You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:22 pm

ukimalefu wrote:
Nini wrote: I reckon you bet wrong.

wanna bet?

No.

rjprice wrote: You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?

Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.

StaticAge · Post by **StaticAge** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:35 pm

Nini wrote:Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.

Pretty much.

Séamas · Post by **Séamas** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:45 pm

Nini wrote:
ukimalefu wrote:
Nini wrote: I reckon you bet wrong.

wanna bet?

No.
rjprice wrote: You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?

Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.

I'm that way with most photo-realism--or any "realism" that is derived from and slavishly copied from a photograph.

Realism/naturalism from a seated model (from life) on the other hand, I like very much.

The choice of medium is interesting. The ability to achieve that much color nuance from such limited media is very impressive.

StaticAge · Post by **StaticAge** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:54 pm

Séamas wrote:
Nini wrote:
ukimalefu wrote:
Nini wrote: I reckon you bet wrong.

wanna bet?

No.
rjprice wrote: You want lofi art? How about ballpoint pen?

Don't care for it, technically impressive but leaves me cold somehow.

I'm that way with most photo-realism--or any "realism" that is derived from and slavishly copied from a photograph.

Realism/naturalism from a seated model (from life) on the other hand, I like very much.

The choice of medium is interesting. The ability to achieve that much color nuance from such limited media is very impressive.

No, actually stuff that is very seriously devoted to copying photographs (photorealism) in a conscious way is intriguing to me. I'm biased because of my own work, but just saying. Like there is a difference to me where you can tell someone just worked from a photograph and where someone knew that there was this real event but I am gong to meticulously work to copy a photo bit by bit and that the end result was pretty unreal as far as they were concerned. Its very elitist, I suppose, but if I know that the person has an awareness of how abstract "realism" is in art, then, there is a huge gap between that and someone who is just trying to imitate a photo because they think a photo is more real than an impressionistic expressionist painting or whatever. [/artgeek]

Post by **rjprice** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:56 pm

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:53 pm

I'm pro-freckles.

StaticAge · Post by **StaticAge** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:54 pm

Shnicky-Poo wrote: I'm pro-freckles.

FOR THE RECORD: me too.

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:00 pm

Why hello... :shifty:

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:31 pm

Uh-oh.

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:07 am

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:34 am

THE POWER OF GINGER COMPELS YOU

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:35 am

Can it not and say it did? Just Geesie turning on the charm is a big "RUN AWAY NOW" flag.

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:58 am

The choices are either run away or be drawn in.

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:06 am

I'm pretty sure being drawn in is a statutory rape charge alone.

Post by **rjprice** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:46 am

Welcome to MacStack, where "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" is a pick-up line.

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:00 pm

rjprice wrote: Welcome to MacStack, where "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" is a pick-up line.

Post by **rjprice** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:01 pm

. . . if you know what I mean

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:05 pm

Damn, you're really in the zone!

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:32 pm

He really is, he should totally put his back out more.

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:49 pm

What I'd like to know is, did he find that pic on the web, or did he go out and take it himself just for laughs?

Nini · Post by **Nini** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:58 pm

Always wonder.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:22 pm

Post by **rjprice** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:17 pm

ScifiterX · Post by **ScifiterX** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:02 pm

Shnicky-Poo · Post by **Shnicky-Poo** » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:47 pm

Nice, but not exactly practical.

The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)