The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 2:16 pm

Warin wrote: I suppose that is a decent enough point. I guess I just really don't give a damn if a company panders to people with more money than brains, so long as they provide the same product at a price regular folks can afford. And in this case, the basic Apple Watch does exactly the same thing for a fraction of the price.

If you think that a $350 watch that exists solely so you don't have to take your phone out of your pocket is for "regular folks" you might want to recalibrate "regular"

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 2:49 pm

Geesie wrote:
Warin wrote: I suppose that is a decent enough point. I guess I just really don't give a damn if a company panders to people with more money than brains, so long as they provide the same product at a price regular folks can afford. And in this case, the basic Apple Watch does exactly the same thing for a fraction of the price.

If you think that a $350 watch that exists solely so you don't have to take your phone out of your pocket is for "regular folks" you might want to recalibrate "regular"

exactly

in terms of statement and branding, it's gross

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 2:49 pm

did someone say gross?

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 2:52 pm

p. sure that's paint.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:02 pm

Geesie wrote: p. sure that's paint.

I was gonna say photoshop

DEyncourt · Post by **DEyncourt** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:03 pm

Study looks at average weekly consumption of alchoholic drinks by men and women in US UK broken down by age:

EDIT: d'oh.

Farmerkev · Post by **Farmerkev** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:11 pm

Geesie wrote:
Warin wrote: I suppose that is a decent enough point. I guess I just really don't give a damn if a company panders to people with more money than brains, so long as they provide the same product at a price regular folks can afford. And in this case, the basic Apple Watch does exactly the same thing for a fraction of the price.

If you think that a $350 watch that exists solely so you don't have to take your phone out of your pocket is for "regular folks" you might want to recalibrate "regular"

You're just being argumentative.
Apple sells plenty of 2-$400 toys like iPads and pods to regular people every day of the week.

Warin · Post by **Warin** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:45 pm

TOS wrote: did someone say gross?

Hey! Chaos Space Marine. Cool!

Warin · Post by **Warin** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:46 pm

Geesie wrote:
Warin wrote: I suppose that is a decent enough point. I guess I just really don't give a damn if a company panders to people with more money than brains, so long as they provide the same product at a price regular folks can afford. And in this case, the basic Apple Watch does exactly the same thing for a fraction of the price.

If you think that a $350 watch that exists solely so you don't have to take your phone out of your pocket is for "regular folks" you might want to recalibrate "regular"

I am a regular guy, not wealthy (but, true enough, not poor) at all, and I want an Apple watch. I'll likely get one at some point as well... just not in April.

Séamas · Post by **Séamas** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:37 pm

DEyncourt wrote: Study looks at average weekly consumption of alchoholic drinks by men and women in US broken down by age:

LOL
I was thinking that looked about right, but was thinking it was about individual sessions (as opposed to per week).

:heh:

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:43 pm

Also the numbers are for the UK, which isn't as wacky prohibitionist as the US.

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:01 pm

Séamas wrote:
DEyncourt wrote: Study looks at average weekly consumption of alchoholic drinks by men and women in US broken down by age:

LOL
I was thinking that looked about right, but was thinking it was about individual sessions (as opposed to per week).

You weren't the only one to make that mistake! :lol:

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:03 pm

Wow. I guess I'm really behind.

DEyncourt · Post by **DEyncourt** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:40 pm

Geesie wrote: Also the numbers are for the UK, which isn't as wacky prohibitionist as the US.

D'oh--I thought it was for the US.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:35 am

justine · Post by **justine** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:48 pm

Super-Man?

justine · Post by **justine** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:48 pm

change.jpg

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 6:41 pm

justine wrote: Super-Man?

That's why it's funny.

But actually, the correct name for that character (minus the big nose) is Spider-Man, yes, with the hyphen.

And the last son of Krypton is Superman, no hyphen.

[/nerd]

justine · Post by **justine** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 6:57 pm

ukimalefu wrote:
justine wrote: Super-Man?

That's why it's funny.

But actually, the correct name for that character (minus the big nose) is Spider-Man, yes, with the hyphen.

And the last son of Krypton is Superman, no hyphen.

[/nerd]

Yeah, yer a nerd!

justine · Post by **justine** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:12 pm

This isn't random because they're mine, but i wanted to post it anyway. Stoppers for my 22s.

toadstoolstoppers.jpg

user · Post by **user** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:20 pm

You put them in the barrels? How cute.

user · Post by **user** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:24 pm

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:22 pm

DEyncourt · Post by **DEyncourt** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:29 pm

Dandelight: a lamp made with hand-plucked dandelion seeds attached to an LED:

DEyncourt · Post by **DEyncourt** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:07 pm

The Ghostly WWII Ruins of Europe’s Northern Coasts":

The author has spent the last four years travelling some 23,000 miles to capture this and other images of WWII ruins designed to protect from invasion. The linked article has 15 of these images including the above near Lossiemouth in Moray, Scotland.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:14 pm

user · Post by **user** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:15 pm

clever

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Fri Mar 13, 2015 1:26 am

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:31 pm

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 1:57 pm

Whoa.

You can even see his testicles.

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 3:25 pm

His brain however is nowhere to be found.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:24 pm

Bacon hot dog donut

That can't be real

juice · Post by **juice** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:27 pm

You know how I know you're not American? When you doubt our skills at inventing new ways to become obese.

obvs · Post by **obvs** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:38 pm

You could always have a churro dog instead...

And I would eat a churro dog. I'm not even kidding.

Metacell · Post by **Metacell** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:22 pm

Oh yeah...nothing wrong with that! Would eat for sure.

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:44 am

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:10 pm

that'll buff right out

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:48 pm

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:10 pm

The price is right.

Pithecanthropus · Post by **Pithecanthropus** » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:17 pm

Looks like it's time for a re-post:

I found this a few years ago at a local discount store.

The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)