The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:27 pm

i knew a guy on a forum with a 911 who went nuts on a frozen lake once ... i couldn't believe the video

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:06 pm

it was a truly memorable experience for the lad

user · Post by **user** » Sat Apr 05, 2014 10:15 pm

I once beat a Tweetsie "Indian" that picked me up on the head with a hard plastic tomahawk when I was that kid's age.

He put me down awful fast.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 1:20 pm

Not one hour ago

If you see a venezuelan behind you, get out of the stick fiddling way. The guy in the tumbling car walked out of it.

user · Post by **user** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 1:53 pm

Think I'd want to get away from the guy in the other car.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 1:59 pm

user wrote: Think I'd want to get away from the guy in the other car.

Yeah, it's like he cut in front of the other, but the race officers gave Maldonado a 10 seconds penalty anyway, like it was his fault. I suppose they have all the camera angles an telemetry... not that I want it to be his fault.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:56 pm

i like the irony of the billboard in the background expressing support for michael schumacher

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 3:46 pm

you know what they say about men with big clips ...

user · Post by **user** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 3:48 pm

4x5 Kodachrome!

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 3:50 pm

scratchin' tree

Post by dv » Sun Apr 06, 2014 4:24 pm

TOS wrote: you know what they say about men with big clips ...

They attract looks of fascination from younger, inexperienced men in SNAFU shirts?

Aaron_R · Post by **Aaron_R** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:35 pm

wouldnt that cause lots of jam issues?

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 6:19 pm

Yes, though it would be possible to mitigate the issue, I'm sure that amount of care and expense did not go into its construction.

user · Post by **user** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 6:21 pm

It might not be a full clip. The curve is show for dumbfucks.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:42 pm

Post by dv » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:45 pm

I'm guessing that's a "не будь киска" moment?

user · Post by **user** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:46 pm

That Russian for hershey?

Post by **sturner** » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:58 pm

Kirk wrote: Yes, though it would be possible to mitigate the issue, I'm sure that amount of care and expense did not go into its construction.

operationally, in the field, it would be a nightmare.

Post by dv » Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:31 pm

user wrote: That Russian for hershey?

It's Google Russian for "Don't be a kitty."

I do so love the Daily Show.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:15 am

sturner wrote:
Kirk wrote: Yes, though it would be possible to mitigate the issue, I'm sure that amount of care and expense did not go into its construction.
operationally, in the field, it would be a nightmare.

I mean it would be possible to cunningly (and expensively) build the spring such that it did not create undue force on the rounds when the clip was full. In other words jamming would not be a problem. . . for a small fortune.
I'm sure having that big heavy thing down below the rifle would play hell with control / sighting regardless.

maurvir · Post by **maurvir** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:30 am

Kirk wrote:
sturner wrote:
Kirk wrote: Yes, though it would be possible to mitigate the issue, I'm sure that amount of care and expense did not go into its construction.
operationally, in the field, it would be a nightmare.
I mean it would be possible to cunningly (and expensively) build the spring such that it did not create undue force on the rounds when the clip was full. In other words jamming would not be a problem. . . for a small fortune.
I'm sure having that big heavy thing down below the rifle would play hell with control / sighting regardless.

I'm reasonably certain "aiming" that thing is more an exercise of "point in the general direction". The first few rounds might actually go in that direction, too...

DukeofNuke · Post by **DukeofNuke** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:44 am

Yeah, the first few.
If you tried to empty that thing, before you were half-way your barrell would be so hot it would begin to distort and bullets would just be goin' everwhere ...

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:15 am

Hey now, happiness is a warm gun.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:22 am

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:24 am

The potential design for my first tattoo.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:30 am

Family? Not bad though let's try to get a double entendre in there.

For some reason I have a muddy memory that naval flags are read from the bottom up. I'm not finding confirmation or denial of this on any site I'm finding right now. Or is this wrong?

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:44 am

jkahless wrote:

The potential design for my first tattoo.

I suggest this instead

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:46 pm

BAAD28?
I don't get it.

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:56 pm

No, but he should.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:15 pm

Care to enlighten the rest of us?

Also

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:18 pm

Kirk wrote: Care to enlighten the rest of us?

Also

t's time to add Cannabis to this list. Cannabis is a far less-harmful and less-addictive alternative to alcohol and we could prevent a lot of the harm that alcohol causes by giving people the right to choose cannabis instead of alcohol. While alcohol kills 80,000 people/year in the U.S., cannabis kills none. And it's alcohol that causes liver disease, cancer and brain damage, cannabis doesn't cause any of these things. As far as addiction goes - cannabis is only about as addictive as coffee. Cannabis is a far safer alternative to alcohol and it's time to put it on the same legal footing as beer and wine. Chardonnay Cabernet Merlot Cannabis - only ONE lacks the ability to kill

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:01 pm

Geesie wrote: No, but he should.

I must admit I don't Couldn't find it in the ICOS and otherwise it's just not ringing any bells. It is a hex code for a mustards yellow...

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:03 pm

jkahless wrote:
Geesie wrote: No, but he should.

I must admit I don't Couldn't find it in the ICOS and otherwise it's just not ringing any bells. It is a hex code for a mustards yellow...

Check your ATP/MTP I vol II

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:21 pm

Geesie wrote:
Kirk wrote: Care to enlighten the rest of us?

Also

t's time to add Cannabis to this list. Cannabis is a far less-harmful and less-addictive alternative to alcohol and we could prevent a lot of the harm that alcohol causes by giving people the right to choose cannabis instead of alcohol. While alcohol kills 80,000 people/year in the U.S., cannabis kills none. And it's alcohol that causes liver disease, cancer and brain damage, cannabis doesn't cause any of these things. As far as addiction goes - cannabis is only about as addictive as coffee. Cannabis is a far safer alternative to alcohol and it's time to put it on the same legal footing as beer and wine. Chardonnay Cabernet Merlot Cannabis - only ONE lacks the ability to kill

I dunno, there's been one death in Colorado recently from eating a large amount.

jkahless · Post by **jkahless** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:29 pm

I got it now. I'm doing so tonight!

The Canadian Coast Guard doesn't use the ATP/MTP, we stick to INTERCO as we're not part of the armed forces.

I was thinking of this, but it seemed too close to the truth.

Post by dv » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:30 pm

Kirk wrote:
Geesie wrote:
Kirk wrote: Care to enlighten the rest of us?

Also

t's time to add Cannabis to this list. Cannabis is a far less-harmful and less-addictive alternative to alcohol and we could prevent a lot of the harm that alcohol causes by giving people the right to choose cannabis instead of alcohol. While alcohol kills 80,000 people/year in the U.S., cannabis kills none. And it's alcohol that causes liver disease, cancer and brain damage, cannabis doesn't cause any of these things. As far as addiction goes - cannabis is only about as addictive as coffee. Cannabis is a far safer alternative to alcohol and it's time to put it on the same legal footing as beer and wine. Chardonnay Cabernet Merlot Cannabis - only ONE lacks the ability to kill

I dunno, there's been one death in Colorado recently from eating a large amount.

Didn't he jump out a window?

I wanna know where Geesie copypastad that from.

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:33 pm

dv wrote:
Kirk wrote:
Geesie wrote:
Kirk wrote: Care to enlighten the rest of us?

Also

t's time to add Cannabis to this list. Cannabis is a far less-harmful and less-addictive alternative to alcohol and we could prevent a lot of the harm that alcohol causes by giving people the right to choose cannabis instead of alcohol. While alcohol kills 80,000 people/year in the U.S., cannabis kills none. And it's alcohol that causes liver disease, cancer and brain damage, cannabis doesn't cause any of these things. As far as addiction goes - cannabis is only about as addictive as coffee. Cannabis is a far safer alternative to alcohol and it's time to put it on the same legal footing as beer and wine. Chardonnay Cabernet Merlot Cannabis - only ONE lacks the ability to kill

I dunno, there's been one death in Colorado recently from eating a large amount.

Didn't he jump out a window?

I wanna know where Geesie copypastad that from.

Comments on the linked article.

Post by dv » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:34 pm

You read comments? You sicko.

ukimalefu · Post by **ukimalefu** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:35 pm

Geesie · Post by **Geesie** » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:36 pm

jkahless wrote: I got it now. I'm doing so tonight!

The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re:

Re:

Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re:

Re:

Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Re: The Random Image Thread (keeping it PG-13 at the worst)

Re: