Game of F'ing Thrones: the F'ing Show

Page: 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 24
Online now: No visible users
Post Reply
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
Wonder if any of them involve dwarves.
mmaverick my steady systematic decline
User avatar
DEyncourt posted:
Well, this short article is more about the books so do NOT click here if you wish to keep your TV experience pristine.

I just wanted to quote Martin from this:
Quote:
I’ve had letters from fans who want me to present particular explicit male sex scenes. Most of these letters come from women.... I don’t pretend to understand this, I just read my email


Some dudes like lesbian porn. It's not a difficult concept, but the more I read of GRRM, the more I dislike him.
mmaverick posted:
DEyncourt posted:
Well, this short article is more about the books so do NOT click here if you wish to keep your TV experience pristine.

I just wanted to quote Martin from this:
Quote:
I’ve had letters from fans who want me to present particular explicit male sex scenes. Most of these letters come from women.... I don’t pretend to understand this, I just read my email


Some dudes like lesbian porn. It's not a difficult concept, but the more I read of GRRM, the more I dislike him.

Um, how many dudes like reading lesbian porn?
mmaverick my steady systematic decline
User avatar
Is this the first time you've heard that women like written erotica? Christ, they'll even let res write it.
mmaverick posted:
Is this the first time you've heard that women like written erotica? Christ, they'll even let res write it.

Um....
DEyncourt posted:
[snip]
Um, how many dudes like reading lesbian porn?
[bold changed for emphasis]

I'm not sure how you would determine from the above that I am unaware that a lot of women like written porn (and it would be next-to-impossible for any reader to be unaware of the "50 Shades" phenomenon).

Perhaps you were using "Some dudes" as a non-gendered term but that isn't common. "Dudes" is usually synonymous with "men", so much so that when attempting to be more inclusive many people will say something like "Hello dudes and dudettes".
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
mmaverick my steady systematic decline
User avatar
DEyncourt posted:
mmaverick posted:
Is this the first time you've heard that women like written erotica? Christ, they'll even let res write it.

Um....
DEyncourt posted:
[snip]
Um, how many dudes like reading lesbian porn?
[bold changed for emphasis]

I'm not sure how you would determine from the above that I am unaware that a lot of women like written porn (and it would be next-to-impossible for any reader to be unaware of the "50 Shades" phenomenon).

Perhaps you were using "Some dudes" as a non-gendered term but that isn't common. "Dudes" is usually synonymous with "men", so much so that when attempting to be more inclusive many people will say something like "Hello dudes and dudettes".



OK, I guess you didn't understand my point, so I'll try it again ;)

Most women prefer erotica over porn. Most men prefer porn over erotica.

Many dudes like to watch lesbian porn. Many dudettes like to read gay erotica.
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
Quote:
Many dudettes like to read gay erotica.

[citation needed]


Anyway, I been in agreement with the "Jon is the son of Ranghar" hypothesis for a long time. I predict Milsandre will have to help him out of his current predicament, kinda like the knight with the flaming sword coming back to life. but then, would he be Zombie Jon?
mmaverick my steady systematic decline
User avatar
DukeofNuke posted:
Quote:
Many dudettes like to read gay erotica.

[citation needed]


Anyway, I been in agreement with the "Jon is the son of Ranghar" hypothesis for a long time. I predict Milsandre will have to help him out of his current predicament, kinda like the knight with the flaming sword coming back to life. but then, would he be Zombie Jon?



http://www.heroesandheartbreakers.com/blogs/2011/05/why-do-straight-women-read-gay-male-erotica

http://gawker.com/5615899/why-are-straight-women-so-obsessed-with-gay-sex

http://www.lambdaliterary.org/features/06/08/straight-womengay-romance/

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/i_love_gay_male_porn/

http://www.allparenting.com/my-life/articles/970447/is-gay-male-erotica-the-next-big-thing
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
citations accepted (damn-it! I opened those links at work!) :p
mmaverick posted:
[snip]
OK, I guess you didn't understand my point, so I'll try it again ;)

Most women prefer erotica over porn. Most men prefer porn over erotica.

Many dudes like to watch lesbian porn. Many dudettes like to read gay erotica.

So...what part of:
DEyncourt posted:
[snip]
I'm not sure how you would determine from the above that I am unaware that a lot of women like written porn (and it would be next-to-impossible for any reader to be unaware of the "50 Shades" phenomenon).
[snip]

...do you not understand? Because it is plain that you read the immediately above without any sort of comprehension to respond that way.

And porn == erotica. It is silly to claim any sort of difference in definitions. It is more a "-I- enjoy erotica while you indulge in porn" type of difference than anything truly usable.

(I guess I could complete the saying with "and he is consumed by smut").
jkahless Custom Title
User avatar
DEyncourt posted:
mmaverick posted:
[snip]
OK, I guess you didn't understand my point, so I'll try it again ;)

Most women prefer erotica over porn. Most men prefer porn over erotica.

Many dudes like to watch lesbian porn. Many dudettes like to read gay erotica.

So...what part of:
DEyncourt posted:
[snip]
I'm not sure how you would determine from the above that I am unaware that a lot of women like written porn (and it would be next-to-impossible for any reader to be unaware of the "50 Shades" phenomenon).
[snip]

...do you not understand? Because it is plain that you read the immediately above without any sort of comprehension to respond that way.

And porn == erotica. It is silly to claim any sort of difference in definitions. It is more a "-I- enjoy erotica while you indulge in porn" type of difference than anything truly usable.

(I guess I could complete the saying with "and he is consumed by smut").


Did someone say... Smut?

http://youtu.be/iaHDBL7dVgs

:D
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
I don't know how to define porn, but I know it when I see it.

Can we get back to speculating about GOT now?
Pariah Know Your Enemy
User avatar
DEyncourt posted:
Well, this short article is more about the books so do NOT click here if you wish to keep your TV experience pristine.

I just wanted to quote Martin from this:
Quote:
I’ve had letters from fans who want me to present particular explicit male sex scenes. Most of these letters come from women.... I don’t pretend to understand this, I just read my email

Lots of men like lesbian scenes, why wouldn't some women like gay scenes?
I just watched the first episode of the first season. Seems like a nerd's-eye-view of what the dark ages might be like. Dragon's eggs and lots of T&A. I hope it gets better.
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
Just go with it and enjoy the sumptuous sets.
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
Give it at least five episodes; that should be enough to hook you good.

You do know, it's not-exactly ... Earth, right?
I'm going to give it a chance. It's well done and Sean Bean and Mr Dinklage are always reliable. But so far everyone are just stock characters mostly uttering exposition to lay out the story. Fair enough. That has to get done. I think the sex is getting in the way. If the story becomes dominated by who's-having-sex-with-who then I'll pass like I did with Mad Men.
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
Ribtor posted:
I'm going to give it a chance. It's well done and Sean Bean and Mr Dinklage are always reliable. But so far everyone are just stock characters mostly uttering exposition to lay out the story. Fair enough. That has to get done. I think the sex is getting in the way. If the story becomes dominated by who's-having-sex-with-who then I'll pass like I did with Mad Men.


good plan. Make sure you at least finish the first season.

(Heh, heh ... :shifty: )
Ribtor posted:
I'm going to give it a chance. It's well done and Sean Bean and Mr Dinklage are always reliable. But so far everyone are just stock characters mostly uttering exposition to lay out the story. Fair enough. That has to get done. I think the sex is getting in the way. If the story becomes dominated by who's-having-sex-with-who then I'll pass like I did with Mad Men.

While sex has its role, "Song of Fire and Ice" (which is the name of the book series of which "A Game of Thrones" is the first book) is more about court intrigue, the power play going on while the existential threat of "Winter is Coming" looms over them all. Season 1 is rather faithful to book 1 with understandable compression of characters (someone has tallied the number of named characters in the so-far five books of "Song" at over 1,200) and storylines necessary for such a translation to screen.

Right now after 4 seasons for "Game of Thrones" HBO has about 2 books of material to catch up with George R.R. Martin (and I think HBO could easily make 3 to 5 seasons from them), and Martin is still working on the final two books for "Song". He said that he has the main story with the major characters plotted but there are all of those minor characters and the problem of actually writing it all....
Sex does have its place, in the books it's handled a lot better than the show, imo. The show has cheesy flashes of nudity that lends itself towards a skinemax aesthetic that takes away from the story. It has all the nuance of an explosion in a Michael Bay production.

And people are like "of course there should be nudity, it's part of the scene," but that's just like someone defending Michael Bay by going "but it's war, you gotta have explosions etc". It's just handled so cheesily. To me it's the worst part of the show. It would be like if Adventure Time ran on paid cable and the writers felt obligated to have f-bombs drop arbitrarily. "But that's how kids talk" Sure, but if you're going to do that you should be able to write it up like the dialog in Superbad, and if not, then admit it's just a gimmick.
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
I'd love to hear Jake get mad and cuss a blue streak!
:lol:
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
"Goddamnit Finn! Get your head out of the Fire Princesses ass and help me fight the stick fiddling Ice King!"
DukeofNuke posted:
I'd love to hear Jake get mad and cuss a blue streak!
:lol:

Its the same dude who does the voice for Bender, thats not too hard to imagine
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
Kiss my shiny Valyrian steel ass.
"Game of Thrones Season 4 - History and Lore of Westeros". Note: there are 16 parts, most under 5 minutes (while the clock for part 16 says that it is about 43 minutes long, it is really only about 3 minutes with the rest of the video being the other parts). The narrator of each section is an appropriate character.
The sillier parts of "Game of Thrones". The link is to part 1 of 7, each being 10-20 minutes long. Note that some segments mention things like "Now that all of your characters survived Season 1..." so there are some spoilers for anyone who hasn’t watched all of the seasons so far, but most are interviews with or by the actors off the set. I do not recall any spoilers for the upcoming Season 5.
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
OK, ladies and gents, today's the day!

9 pm to those not paying attention. Just a few short hours. Enough time to stock up on the wine.

I took advantage of the free month of HBO Now on my Apple TV, so I won't have to wait on a lores copy on Couch Tuner. The new episode will be available to me anytime after 9 with dvr playability. All of the other seasons are on it, too. Watched "The Children" on Friday. If you have regular HBO, Season 4 is playing right now for those who want to catch up.

Guess I should start a new thread or request "Season 4" to be removed from this one.
TOS
User avatar
oops, the first few episodes just leaked online

that's gonna hurt!

but maybe it'll be a wakeup call for hbo, whose digital strategy has been a disaster
Alexander Supertramp this was uncalled for.
User avatar
Has it been? HBO Go has always been solid, and has mostly all their content (WHY NO OZ?), and HBO Now is pretty progressive.
TOS
User avatar
only now is it possible to get it without a cable subscription, and it still costs double what it should
dv
User avatar
TOS posted:
only now is it possible to get it without a cable subscription, and it still costs double what it should

I would tend to agree on the pricing, but I think that it's a service people will subscribe to 3 months out of the year rather than year round - like my parents (teachers) used to do with cable (3-4 months in the summer, videotape everything.)

That'll take some of the sting out of it. To say nothing of login sharing.

Subscribing and unsubscribing to MMOs or other online services as finances and tastes dictate actually seems to be pretty common. I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes more common for narrowly-focused streaming services like this.

I also wouldn't be surprised if they sold overpriced 24 or 48-hour HBO passes.
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
They can't undercut the cable price - yet.

Wait until it's on all the other devices.
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
He got saved and shorn his golden locks. Same actor, though.
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
DukeofNuke FREE RADICAL
User avatar
user Stupid cockwomble
User avatar
The people making comments on gator didn't seem to know who he was.

Now I'm wondering if the twins are in the show.
Alexander Supertramp this was uncalled for.
User avatar
TOS posted:
only now is it possible to get it without a cable subscription, and it still costs double what it should


It's expensive compared to Netflix, etc. but they are the first premium cable channel to be available without cable. That's a good thing.
Subsequent topic  /  Preceding topic
Post Reply

Game of F'ing Thrones: the F'ing Show

Page: 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 24